Updated for v1.76
History Tracking is Location Tracking 2.0.
We've expanded the Location tracking feature to handle more nuanced policies for managing chronological relationships between an expanded set of record types in the database model.
Prior to version 1.76 we supported three ways for collection managers to determine the current location and location history of objects.
- Direct object-location references. provided a simple history of objects' storage locations over time.
- Movement-based location tracking recorded detailed information about how one or more objects are transferred between locations, in addition to the location history. This option was intended for collections where documenting chain of custody, insurance and packing are critical.
- Workflow-based location tracking was designed for institutions with a robust notion of location and expanded upon either of the preceding two options. In contrast with other methods, which all record relationships between objects and locations (with or without movements), workflow-based location tracking took into consideration several types of records to determine the current location of an object, for example storage locations, exhibitions, loans, etc.
Over time it became apparent that other records types required a similar type of description that captured a chain of custody or connections over time. For example, many users need to catalog a chronological ownership history between objects and entities, which was not possible through our original location tracking model. In this use case it's not sufficient to simply know who owned the object when. Rather, it's important to be able to search and browse not only the "current" collection in which the object resides but also to retrieve all objects "currently" in collections meeting certain criteria. To support these expanded needs we redesigned Location Tracking, creating a more general History Tracking feature.